Archives for October 20, 2008

Practicing Scales with a Jazz Purpose

Twelve is the dread number.

Twelve major scales. Twelve natural minor scales. Twelve melodic minor scales. Twelve harmonic minor scales. Twelve pentatonic, twelve blues, twelve…aaaaaiiiiieeeee!!!

Scales, scales, and more scales. Is there no end to practicing scales?

No.

But, trust me, there is a way to nudge your attitude toward scale practice from drudgery to enjoyment and even inspiration. It begins with understanding how scales apply to your goal of becoming a good jazz improviser.

I wish someone had helped me to understand this better back in my college music days. Maybe my fire would have gotten lit a bit sooner. Or maybe not; admittedly, I was a slacker. Still, if I had understood how those boring, linear progressions of tones became the stuff not only of Bach and Brahms, but also of Bud and Bird, it would have answered a few questions, shortened my learning curve, and helped me to understand not only why to practice scales, but also how.

Here are a few things I wish I had known:

◊ Practicing scales does not just mean playing them straight up and straight down. How often do you actually hear an entire scale played that way in jazz–all the way up for two or three octaves, and then all the way back down? Depending on a player’s approach, what you normally hear in actual jazz solos consists largely of fragments of scales, digital patterns, arpeggios, and the occasional longer, scalar line.

◊ Scale practice includes digital exercises and arpeggios. Once you start adding these, you begin to hear stuff emerging in your practice that sounds like actual building blocks of jazz. Triads and seventh chords rooted on the degrees of the major scale, for instance, are as relevant and functional as you can get, particularly when you start convoluting them in different ways. The following is a sequence of triads in the key of C major; consider each group of four notes to be barred eighth notes: C-E-G-C, D-F-A-D, E-G-B-E, F-A-C-F, G-B-D-G, A-C-E-A, B-D-F-B, C-E-G-C. Get that under your fingers, then try varying the note order thus: C-G-E-C, D-A-F-D, E-B-G-E, F-C-A-F, etc. Figure out other variations.

◊ Interval studies are a great way to get inside a scale. Don’t just practice intervals–think about how they apply. For example, a sequence of sixths has a wonderful way of adding sweetness to a passage. Here’s a cool little application, provided you know some rudimentary piano: first, sound a CM7 on the piano with your left hand. Now, with your right hand, play the following sequence of sixths against the chord: B-G, A-F, G-E, F-D, E-C (hold out the final C). Sounds nice, eh? Note that the first couplet of notes, B and G, are consonant tones, the seventh and fifth of the chord respectively. The next couplet are dual passing tones, and the next consists of two more chord tones, G and E, the fifth and third. Following is another couplet of passing tones, followed by two more chord tones, E and C, the latter being the root of the chord. My point, besides giving you a nice lick: don’t just exercise your fingers–exercise your brain and your ears along with them. THINK about how the material you are practicing applies to various musical situations–to altered dominants, ii-V7-I’s, and so forth.

I’ve by no means exhausted the topic of practicing scales with a jazz purpose in mind, but this is enough to give you the idea and get you started at working things out for yourself.

Be diligent, have fun, and keep blowing!

Forecast Laboratory by WeatherGraphics

Besides serving as the administrator for the renowned online forum for storm chasers, Stormtrack, Tim Vasquez operates Weather Graphics, a resource for meteorologists, students, chasers, and weather enthusiasts.\r\n\r\nI own most of Tim”s books, and I just recently purchased one of his software products. Forecast Laboratory is an apt name for what amounts to an educational game designed to help storm chasers hone their forecasting skills.\r\n\r\nMarshalling atmospheric maps, soundings, and satellite and radar imagery for 488 actual weather days from past years, Forecast Laboratory gives you the basic resources you need to determine whether and where to head out for wild weather. To be exact, you get\r\n* 15,400 surface mesoanalysis charts\r\n* 11,200 radar images\r\n* 8,800 soundings\r\n* 4,900 upper air charts (850, 700, 500, 300, and 200 millibars)\r\n* 3,140 high-resolution satellite images\r\n\r\nBeginning at 1200 UTC, you peruse the full ensemble of charts, then choose from one of twelve cities in the southern and northern plains as a starting point for your chasemobile. From there, you continue to consult the hourly surface charts, radar, and satellite to determine where to move your vehicle. You can move it no more than fifty miles per model run, so you need to make your decisions wisely. Since the software unfolds random scenarios that range from null days and blue-sky busts, to a single tornadic storm in the entire plains, to full-fledged tornado outbreaks, your best choice could involve anything from lots of driving to staying home and playing cards.\r\n\r\nAs the chase progresses, assuming there are storms to be had, you begin to receive LSRs from within your area, and at 01 UTC, you get a final report that tells whether you”ve busted or witnessed your share of severe weather, and perhaps photographed tornadoes. \r\n\r\nI”ve played with this software enough to enjoy it, learn from it, and become acquainted with its pros and cons. Here are a few observations:\r\n\r\nLacking such common indices as CAPE, CINH, SRH, sigtors, 0-6k shear, and so forth, Forecast Lab”s stripped-down approach forces you to learn and extrapolate from just the essentials. That”s not at all a bad thing! I find myself paying attention to things I had overlooked before, and to thinking about their implications for the weather six to eight hours from now.\r\n\r\nA quick glance at the list of features will show you that you get far more surface maps than anything else. From 850 mbs up, the 1200 UTC run is the only run provided. Obviously, that”s not realistic; RUC updates all of those maps hourly, not just the surface map. I”d like to see more upper air maps. However, I”ve found that what is available is still usually enough information to work with.\r\n\r\nThe program is more generous with radar and satellite info, but you can”t count on having them. Sometimes the remote imaging drops in and drops out from run to run–you just never know.\r\n\r\nAlso, the “chase karma” feature appears to have a bug that makes it a bit quirky. The feature is supposed to give you a sense of how you”re doing, but I”ve found that I”m better off just ignoring it.\r\n\r\nIn all, Forecast Laboratory leaves some room for improvement. But that being said, Tim Vasquez has hit on a great concept. There”s nothing else like it that I”m aware of. Just as it stands, it”s a lot of fun, and a superb way to make use of the off-season by sharpening your forecasting abilities. You get to test your knowledge and instincts in real-life setups and then see the results, and you have the luxury of busting–an inescapable part of a storm chaser”s “tuition”–without wasting time and gas.\r\n\r\nIf you”re new to storm chasing and haven”t familiarized yourself with the fundamentals of severe weather forecasting, do your reading before you tackle Forecast Laboratory. If you already have an essential grasp of forecasting, this software can help you tighten the screws.\r\n\r\nRecommended.